Thursday, 29 September 2016

Recognising Gladiators: Ⅵ the Hoplomachus



 
Fig. ❶ Hoplomachus in full attire on the Zliten mosaic. around AD 200. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gladiators_from_the_Zliten_mosaic_3.JPG

Hoplomachus
The word “hoplomachus” derived from “hoplitesὁπλίτης, -often called “hoplite” in English- which is the name of the Greek type of warrior that fought with a round shield and a spear [i] in the renowned phalanx formation. Just like the thraex and the Republican gallus, the hoplomachus is an example of how a defeated enemy of Rome was transformed into a gladiator type [ii].
 
Fig. ❷ Greek vase produced in Athens showing a hoplite, ca 535, Oudheidkundig Museum Leiden (the Netherlands).

 Clothes

Like most types of gladiators, murmillones wear a “subligaculum”, which is a loincloth held in place by a wide belt called “balteus”. Also like most other types, they often have some kind of cloth or leather covering the top of their feet, but they are almost never shown wearing shoes with soles. The term “gladiator sandals” therefore seems to be an invention of the sword-and-sandal movies of the 1950s and ‘60s. It was later further popularised by the fashion industry.


 Manica (armguard)

Only on the right arm, there is a “manica” (arm guard) because this is the arm that will need to leave the protection of the shield to lash out at the opponent. The left arm is usually behind the shield so there is no need for a manica. In fact, wearing one on the left arm would only add extra weight and hinder the arm’s movement.


 Ocreae (greaves)

The hoplomachus, like the thraex, is a parmularius (“one who carries a small shield”) [iii]. This means he needs two long ocreae (greaves) and not just one short ocrea on the left leg like the scutarii (“those who carry large shields” like the murmillo etc.). The upper legs are protected by padded wrappings (fasciae).


 Cassis / galea

The cassis (helmet) of the hoplomachus is very similar to that of the thraex, though it has a plain crest without the griffon’s head (Fig. ❸)

Fig. ❸Funerary relief depicting a hoplomachus.30-50 CE, Chieti (Italy), Gladiator exhibition ("Gladiatoren: Helden van het Colosseum"), Gallo-Romeins Museum, Tongeren (Belgium).
 Clipeus / parmula

The bronze shield used by the hoplomachus was convex and did not have a shield boss (Fig. ❶&❸). It was based on the aspis ἀσπίς that was used by Greek hoplites. As you can see in these Greek reliefs [iv][v], the aspis had what is called an Argive shield grip [vi]: a metal loop in the centre through which the arm was passed to grip a second loop near the rim of the shield. Traditionally, a hoplite’s aspis would have measured ± 90 cm (± 3 ft.) in diameter [vii].

The shields used by the Roman hoplomachi however, look significantly smaller on most depictions. One example found in the gladiator barracks of Pompeii measured a mere ±40cm (15-16 inch) [viii] in diameter. This is far too small to have the first loop in the centre of the shield so the loops are both near the rim: one to the left and one to the right. Furthermore, the hoplomachus’s shield also appears to be more deeply domed than the original Greek aspis.


 Hasta

The fact that the shield is quite inadequate to keep the adversary at a distance is somewhat compensated by the large hasta (spear) the hoplomachus has in his right hand (Fig. ❶&). It is possible that the hasta was hurled at the opponent at some point early in the duel, or perhaps he had to drop it sometimes, because many depictions show the hoplomachus without the hasta [PIIIIC]. This seems only natural as a spear is quite heavy and impractical to use with one arm for a longer period of time.


 Pugio

 In his shield hand, the hoplomachus carried a pugio (Fig. ❶&❸).

Luckily for him, the hoplomachus could fall back on this pugio when he no longer had his hasta. If the adversary somehow managed to get past his spear point for example, the hasta would have lost its use and all the hoplomachus could have done was drop it and quickly grab his dagger with his right hand.


Opponents

Like the thraex, the hoplomachus was most often pitted against the heavily armed murmillo (Fig. ❹).
When he still had his spear, the most obvious target for the hoplomachus seems to have been  the murmillo’s throat and chest area, right between the cassis and the scutum. When he had lost his spear, he would have needed to get quite close to the murmillo in order to stab him with his pugio, but this held a risk because at that point, he exposed himself more than the murmillo, with his larger shield, did. For that reason, the hoplomachus would have needed to remain both aggressive and quick enough to stay in control of the distance between him and his opponent so that the murmillo did not have a chance to strike first.

Another possible adversary would be the thraex (Fig. ❺). These two types both have a small shield which makes them quick, but vulnerable. It is easy to imagine how this could easily result in a dynamic struggle.
Fig. ❹ Hoplomachus versus Murmillo
Fig. ❺ Hoplomachus versus Thraex

References:
[i] Nossov, Konstantin (2011) Gladiator: The Complete Guide to Ancient Rome's Bloody Fighters. Rowman & Littlefield: p55.
[ii] Shadrake, Susanna (2005) 2011. The World of the Gladiator. Didcot: Tempus Publishing. Reprint, Stroud: The History Press: p143.
[iii] Dunkle, Roger (2016) Gladiators: Violence and Spectacle in Ancient Rome. Routledge: p106.
[iv] Jastrow (2006) "Amazonomachy Halicarnassus BM 1014.jpg". commons.wikimedia.org https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amazonomachy_Halicarnassus_BM_1014.jpg (accessed September 30, 2016).
[v] Carole Raddato (2012) "Slab from the Amazonomachy frieze from the Mausoleum at Halikarnassos, Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, British Museum.jpg". commons.wikimedia.org https://commons.wikimedia.org /wiki/File:Slab_from_the_Amazonomachy_frieze_from_the_Mausoleum_at_Halikarnassos,_Mausoleum_at_Halicarnassus,_British_Museum.jpg
(accessed September 30, 2016).
[vi] Gabriel, Richard A (2002) The Great Armies of Antiquity. Greenwood Publishing Group: p175.
[vii] Phang, Sara E. et al. (2016) Conflict in Ancient Greece and Rome [3 volumes]: The Definitive Political, Social, and Military Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO : p123.
[viii] Shadrake, Susanna (2005) 2011. The World of the Gladiator. Didcot: Tempus Publishing. Reprint, Stroud: The History Press: p162) 

Thursday, 22 September 2016

Recognising Gladiators: Ⅴ the Thraex


Thraex


"Thraex" means “Thracian”, as in an inhabitant of Thrace, which was the name of the area where now the borders of Bulgaria, Greece and Turkey meet. 


 Clothes
Like most types of gladiators, murmillones wear a “subligaculum”, which is a loincloth held in place by a wide belt called “balteus”. Also like most other types, they often have some kind of cloth or leather covering the top of their feet, but they are almost never shown wearing shoes with soles. The term “gladiator sandals” therefore seems to be an invention of the sword-and-sandal movies of the 1950s and ‘60s. It was later further popularised by the fashion industry.
 

 Manica (armguard)
Only on the right arm, there is a “manica” (arm guard) because this is the arm that will need to leave the protection of the shield to lash out at the opponent. The left arm is usually behind the shield so there is no need for a manica. In fact, wearing one on the left arm would only add extra weight and hinder the arm’s movement.
 
Fig. ❶ Funerary relief with murmillo (left) and a thraex (right).30-50 CE, Chieti (Italy), Gladiator exhibition ("Gladiatoren: Helden van het Colosseum"), Gallo-Romeins Museum, Tongeren (Belgium).

☑ Ocreae (greaves)
Unlike the scutarii ("scutum-carriers" like the murmillo and the secutor), the thraex has an ocrea on each leg (Fig. ❶), not just on the left leg. These ocreae are significantly longer than those used by the scutarii and the upper legs are also protected by fasciae (thick padding) to make up for the small shield. 
 
Fig. ❷ Thraex helmet clearly showing a griffon's head on top. 50-79 CE, Pompeii (Italy), Gladiator exhibition ("Gladiatoren: Helden van het Colosseum"), Gallo-Romeins Museum, Tongeren (Belgium).

 Cassis / galea

The helmet of the thraex is quite similar to that of the hoplomachus, but there is one important difference. As can been seen on Fig. ❷, the crest ends in a griffon’s head. The style of this helmet evolved throughout the Imperial period, but the evolution is similar to that of the murmillo’s helmet except for the crest (Click here for an image of the evolution or the murmillo's helmet).
It is believed that feathers were used instead of horsehair to crown the thraex’s crest [i].

 Parmula
Some statuettes [ii] show a thraex carrying a shield with straps similar to the shield used by the hoplomachus (and therefore also similar to the Greek aspis ἀσπίς), but this is rare.
Fig. ❸ Bronze statuette of a thraex pushing his parmula forward with his sica ready to strike at his right hip. Gladiator exhibition ("Gladiatoren: Helden van het Colosseum"), Gallo-Romeins Museum, Tongeren (Belgium).

Usually, thraeces are depicted with a parmula ("small shield") that looks a lot like the much larger semi-cyllindrical scutum, but without an umbo (shield boss) in the middle (Fig. ❸). Modern re-enactors tend to give this type of shield a vertical centre grip [iii], but the evidence for this is not conclusive as far as the author is aware.
Some statuettes like the ones on Fig. ❹&❺ may be depicting a vertical grip, but it is not even clear if these are in fact depictions of thraeces as the sword is rather straight and helmet’s crest is missing on the statuette in Fig. ❹ and the statuette's head is completely missing on Fig. ❺.This oil lamp [iv] also shows the back of the parmula, but the lack of detail makes it hard to determine how the shield is being gripped.
Fig. ❹ Bronze statuette of a thraex pushing his parmula forward, exposing what might be a vertical centre grip. The griffon's head is missing and the sword looks rather straight, so it is difficult to identify him with certainty. Getty Villa, Los Angeles (USA).
Fig. ❺ Bronze statuette of a murmillo (left) and a defeated thraex (right) down on the ground, exposing what might be a vertical centre grip. The thraex's head is missing, so it is difficult to identify him with certainty. Gladiator exhibition ("Gladiatoren: Helden van het Colosseum"), Gallo-Romeins Museum, Tongeren (Belgium).

Whether it had a horizontal grip or a vertical grip, it clearly had a centre grip. The comparatively light weight of the shield enabled the thraex to move it to the position where it was needed in a quick manner. This makes him considerably more agile and mobile than scutarii.
 
Fig. ❻ Roman oil lamp depicting a thraex (right) stretchting his shield arm towards a murmillo (right). Gladiator exhibition ("Gladiatoren: Helden van het Colosseum"), Gallo-Romeins Museum, Tongeren (Belgium).
As shown on these oil lamp (Fig. ❻ and [v], he could stretch out the arm in which he was carrying the shield towards his adversary to create distance, but also to intercept thrusts and slashed before they gained momentum. Using the much heavier scutum in this manner would put a great deal of strain on the left arm.
The most remarkable part of the thraex’s equipment, is his curved sword called a “sica”.
Some of these swords just curve upwards gently [vi]
, but most depictions show a sica that curves upwards quite abruptly in a more or less 45 degree angle (Fig. ❸&❼).
This weapon is similar to the swords that were used by Dacian and Thracian [vii] warriors. The large Dacian ones are called falces (singular: falx).
Fig. ❼ Thraex named Araxios, 200-300 CE, Akhisar, Turkey. Gladiator exhibition ("Gladiatoren: Helden van het Colosseum"), Gallo-Romeins Museum, Tongeren (Belgium).
Opponents
The thraex is most often depicted fighting the heavily armed murmillo (Fig. ❶).
The thraex on the one hand is agile, but vulnerable and the murmillo on the other hand, is slow but well protected, which makes for an interesting dynamic.
If the thraex managed to use his superior speed and the angle of his sword to his advantage, he could get around the murmillo’s scutum, but if his attack was too predictable, it must have been easy for the murmillo to counter and try and strike at a part of the thraex’s torso that became exposed during the his attack.

Another combination is that of a thraex versus a hoplomachus [viii], but this appears to have decreased in popularity as time went by as most depictions are quite early.
At least one relief has survived on which a match between two thraeces seems to be depicted [vi].
Fig. ❽ Thraex versus Murmillo
 
Fig. ❾ Thraex versus Hoplomachus
 
Fig. ❿ Thraex versus thraex
References:[i] Nossov, Konstantin (2011) Gladiator: The Complete Guide to Ancient Rome's Bloody Fighters. Rowman & Littlefield: p87.]
[ii]
Alan. "Figurine of a Thracian type gladiator. British Museum.". Flickr.com. https://www.flickr.com/photos/kaptainkobold/58133843/in/gallery-40060535@N05-72157627351464811/ (accessed September 23, 2016).
[iii]
Gladiatorenschule AMOR MORTIS. "Trainingskampf Murmillo - Thraex | AMOR MORTIS". YouTube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGhUakVJ7-w (accessed September 23, 2016).
[iv]
"Lamp with a gladiator Roman, Imperial Period, A.D. 50–100"  from MFA Boston, available from Jeremy Aronson on pinterest.com. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/19281104630148832/ (accessed September 23, 2016).
[v] oomegamann. "Gladiatoren Tonlampe Murmillo Thraex". Flickr.com. https://www.flickr.com/photos/40060535@N05/4299333823/ (accessed on September 23, 2016).
[vi]
I. Sh. "Base of a statue with a depiction of training of gladiators. Marble. Late 1st — early 2nd cent. CE. Inv. No. 1915. Patras, New Archaeological Museum". Ancientrome.ru. http://ancientrome.ru/art/artworken/img.htm?id=5964#sel=2:1,3:3 (accessed September 23, 2016).
[vii] Nossov, Konstantin (2011) Gladiator: The Complete Guide to Ancient Rome's Bloody Fighters. Rowman & Littlefield: p100, 174.Steff. "Pottery fragment depicting the Thraex or Thracian gladiator (left), fighting a hoplomachus". wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inaugural_games_of_the_Flavian_Amphitheatre#/media/File:Greek_pottery_2.jpg (accessed September 23, 2016).]